These Crimes Never Needed to Happen

Tuesday, the 28th of October 2025, was the last afternoon that 49-year-old binman Wayne Broadhurst walked his dog. While strolling through a neighbourhood in Uxbridge, West London, Wayne happened upon 22-year-old Safi Dawood, an illegal migrant from Afghanistan, trying to stab a 14-year-old boy and 45-year-old Shahzad Farrukh to death. Wayne intervened, telling the attacker to drop the knife, before being knocked to the ground and stabbed to death, while people filmed from their bedroom windows. Dawood was then Tasered by police and taken into custody.

It is bitterly ironic that Uxbridge is Boris Johnson’s former Parliamentary constituency, given the demographic vandalism his government wrought upon us. Dawood broke into our country by stowing aboard a lorry from France in 2020, and was granted the right to remain in 2022. He is one of the Afghans that Johnson’s government forgot to smuggle in secretly. After the Ministry of Defence leaked an email listing the names of Afghans who collaborated with British Armed Forces, the state saw fit to spend >£7bn importing unknown thousands of Afghans and their family members, including Taliban fighters, and enforced a superinjunction to stop the public knowing about it. Those unquantified new arrivals were atop the minimum 180,000 illegals who have broken into our country via small boats since 2018; and atop the four million mostly-third-world migrants who arrived legally as part of the Boriswave.

Wayne’s death is a microcosm of the reckless replacement migration inflicted upon unwilling Brits by successive treacherous governments. He heroically intervened in a dispute between two men who did not need to be here, and ended up dead. Uxbridge has lost a pillar of its community, and the taxpayer has gained another Muslim prisoner to feed while he enjoys a cell with better conditions than in his home country. A just society would give him the death penalty, and spare us the cost of his upkeep.

This is not the only case in the last week. On Saturday night, Anthony Williams boarded an LNER train bound for London King’s Cross, and stabbed eleven people, unprovoked, before the train pulled into Huntingdon Station. Police initially arrested another 35-year-old Caribbean male, after Tasering him by mistake on the platform, before releasing him without charge. Williams was charged with 10 counts of attempted murder, one count of actual bodily harm, and one count of possession of a bladed article. Ten people were taken to hospital; nine with life-threatening injuries. Five have been discharged. Williams is also suspected of three prior incidents: entering a barber shop with a knife in Fletton twice, on Friday and Saturday, and stabbing a 14-year-old boy in the city centre just hours before the train attack. All of these incidents were caught on CCTV.

Williams was born in Britain, but this raises more uncomfortable questions that it settles for liberals. If British identity is just a set of propositions, like love of democracy, tolerance, and respect for the law, then does attempted murder not exclude someone from being considered “British”? If not, then what is British identity? If there are not differences between ethnicities, then why are those of African and Caribbean descent three times more likely to be diagnosed and admitted to hospital with schizophrenia than any other group? Why are black men ten times more likely than whites to screen positive for a psychotic disorder? Why do they commit knife crime and murders, in both gross and per-capita terms, orders of magnitude more than the native English population?

These questions are uncomfortable, because they shatter the blank-slate delusion which undergirds modern antiracist morality. Being born on British soil, or possessing the approved government paperwork, does not make someone sufficiently indistinguishable from the native population. This matters when setting immigration policy, and deciding who is likely to be a friend and benefit to our country, and who is likely to be a costly, violent detractor. The fact is that the presence of these men in our country is optional, and that if they were never here, the passengers of that train would never have had to fear for their lives.

These atrocities coincided with convictions of other foreign criminals making headlines. Last Thursday, Mohamed Kadir of “no fixed abode” was convicted for strangling a railway worker, after boarding a train to Birmingham without paying and being asked to show his ticket. He was sentenced to just 16 months in prison — half that of Lucy Connolly, the mother jailed for an imprudent deleted tweet following the Southport murders. Egyptian Mohamed Samak was also convicted for stabbing his wife Joanne to death at their home in Droitwich Spa in July, 2024. And of course, there was the mass stabbing in Manchester earlier in October, when Syrian Muslim terrorist Jihad Al-Shamie murdered two men and injured three others at Heaton Park Hebrew Congregation Synagogue on Yom Kippur.

On Friday 24 October, Sudanese illegal migrant Deng Chol Majek was convicted for murdering migrant hotel worker Rhiannon Skye Whyte, stabbing Whyte 23 times with a screwdriver on 20 October, 2024. Majek stalked Whyte to a train station as she made her way home, enraged when Rihannon intervened in an argument Majek had with another migrant over a packet of biscuits. Majek had passed through Libya, Italy, and Germany before breaking into Britain. The remorseless killer had already been reported to hotel security for “spookily” staring at three female staff members. Majek lied and denied killing Whyte, despite being caught on CCTV leaving the scene with blood-soaked shoes, walking to a corner shop to buy beer, and then returning to the hotel to celebrate the heinous crime with the other occupants. Rhiannon’s sister, Alex, is now raising her orphaned five-year-old son.

Haybe Cabdiraxmaan Nur was sentenced to 25 years in prison for stabbing bank worker Gurvinder Johal to death on 6 May. Nur travelled from Somalia to Libya in 2016, before receiving $1,800 from an unknown source to pay smugglers for passage to Europe. After receiving a suspended sentence for robbery in Italy, being arrested for bicycle theft in Germany, being charged with three instances of drunken and disorderly behaviour in the Netherlands, and committing eight offences in Luxembourg, Nur made €400 selling cigarettes in Calais’ migrant camps and crossed from France in a dinghy to Britain. He claimed asylum after arriving in October 2024, had his claim rejected in January this year, and was still living here, appealing the decision, when he murdered Johal. He was arrested in Derby on 13 December for running into traffic and headbutting a man, while calling white people racist. Nur has learned that “racist” is a magic spell which compels the liberal regime to acquit them of any wrongdoing in the name of equality.

As was the case with Southport killer, Axel Rudakubana. Headteacher of Acorns School, Joanne Hodson, was told to remove the phrases “sinister” and “cold and calculating” from her education plan for Rudakubana, because mental health workers accused her of racially profiling “a black boy with a knife”. Perhaps, if the system had been more willing to be prejudiced, Alice Da Silva Aguiar, Bebe King, and Elsie Dot Stancombe would still be alive.

The ongoing inquiry into the murders revealed that Axel’s father, Alphonse Rudakubana, tried to hide his son’s violent psychopathy from the authorities. He requested a social worker employed by the council’s Child and Family Wellbeing Service withhold details “that can turn our family upside down”, about Axel’s violent outbursts at home, to Lancashire Council’s youth offending team, who were “in charge of punishing Axel”. “Not to say that there is something sinister”, Alphonse said in a text, “but because it is not necessary.” Axel refused to meet his youth offending team social worker after lockdown ended, in July 2020, but escaped “enforcement action” because of his autism diagnosis. The eventual meeting consisted of Axel completing a “no knives, better lives” worksheet. Two weeks later, he demonstrated he was incapable of empathy in a “victim awareness” course: “struggl[ing] with the concept” of how the pupil he attacked with a hockey stick in 2019 might feel, and returning the conversation to claims that another student had bullied him instead.

But Axel was “a good boy”, Alphonse insisted — protesting his son’s exclusion from Range High School for carrying a knife more than ten times. Alphonse would later acknowledge, in texts to a neighbour, that Axel was ordering suspicious Amazon packages to their home — including the materials his son used to make ricin. Did Alphonse never question their contents? Whose Amazon account, and whose debit or credit card, did Axel use to purchase the knife he used in the murders? If Alphonse had spent less time protecting his psychopathic son, and extended more moral consideration to the children of the country that gave his family asylum, then an entire nation would not have been in mourning for the girls that Axel butchered.

Axel Rudakubana was born in Britain, but he nevertheless harboured a racial hatred of whites, and delighted in the deaths of innocent children. What is the explanation for that, from those who demand we recognise these men as being as British as you and me? Why should we have to live with people who would do our family harm, and who do not need to be here?

Every day, another sex crime is committed by a third-world migrant or asylum seeker. Police are currently hunting a man of “black or of a mixed ethnic background” who raped a girl in Haywards Heath, Sussex. Egyptian illegal migrant Moustafa Elbohy was caught on CCTV raping a woman after abducting her from Charing Cross railway station, nearby his hotel accommodation. Elbohy used a translation app to threaten her in English, and tell her “I want to f**k you”. His lawyer, Nimrah Ashraf, argued he should be granted bail because he suffers from claustrophobia, depression, insomnia, and anxiety. He plans to appeal the rejection of his asylum application; and was previously denied a visa in 2017.

In September, another Egyptian asylum seeker, Abdelrahmen Adnan Abouelela, was jailed for eight-and-a-half years after raping a drunk woman who was walking home alone through Hyde Park in November 2024. Abouelela illegally entered the UK in April 2023, leaving his wife and son behind in Turkey, claiming he would be persecuted if returned to Egypt. That’s because Abouelela belonged to a seven-man cell of the Muslim Brotherhood, and had been sentenced to a seven-year prison sentence for making explosives and planning to bomb electricity pylons and gas lines in 2015 (the exact sort of Jihadist attacks the British government has been warned are imminent, and have done nothing to prevent).

Syrian asylum seeker Qais Al-Aswad was convicted of three counts of sexual assault against three different women from 23 May to 12 June, 2025. But Al-Aswad was spared a six-month prison sentence via a two-year suspension granted by a judge this month, provided he completes 200 hours of unpaid work. Why is this predator still in our country? Picking up litter from the side of the road does not rectify the fact that he never needed to be here to prey on our wives, daughters, sisters, and loved ones in the first place.

Another Syrian asylum seeker, Fawaz Alsamaou, was convicted last week of strangling and sexually assaulting a woman under a bridge, after she left a Cardiff nightclub. Alsamaou complained that a guilty verdict could lead to his deportation. Presiding Judge Celia Hughes scolded Alsamaou, saying “”You say that you’re a practising Muslim but your behaviour that night casts doubt on the practise of your faith.”

Judge Hughes must be unaware that their proper Muhammad condoned the owning and unrestrained rape of “bondwomen”, taken as the “booty” which “Allah has granted you”, and “that which your right hand possesses” (Sahih al-Bukhari 3124; Abd AI Malik Ibn Hisham, The Prophetic Biography) The Quran instructs that wives and sex-slaves are kept for “tillage” (breeding), can be beaten, and cannot leave their husbands or captors (Surah Al-Baqarah 2:223, 2:228; Surah An-Nisa 4:34; Sunan Abu Dawud 5:2142). Muhammad’s successors as Caliph fetishised blonde hair and fair skin, kidnapping “the people of yellow” from the coasts of Cornwall and across Europe and selling them as part of the Arab slave trade. 17 million were traded in bondage by its conclusion in 1920, including 1.25 million Brits and Europeans between the 16th to 18th centuries. This predatory fetish persists today: with people smugglers marketing their services to illegal migrants by secretly filming white women in Britain, drunk and dressed immodestly by Muslim standards, and playing the footage on social media alongside adverts for Channel crossings.

One such customer is Ethiopian sex offender Hadush Kebatu — whose predation on a 14-year-old girl sparked the summer’s immigration protests starting in Epping, Essex. A wild goose chase ensued when police accidentally let Kebatu walk free from custody. The confused criminal returned to prison, and even asked to be deported, but was told to go away because the bureaucracy didn’t know how to handle the situation. Kebatu found a group of fellow Africans who gave him directions, and he took a trip to Dalston Square library, blissfully unaware of the nationwide manhunt for him underway. Two days later, a dogwalker spotted him in Finsbury Park, and two female police officers came to collect him. He was deported the following day, which the Labour government celebrated until it was revealed that he was paid £500 to leave. The message sent is clear: break into our country, prey on schoolgirls, and you will be paid the equivalent of a years’ salary in your homeland, have your hotel fees, legal aid used to frustrate your deportation, and return flight expensed by the long-suffering British taxpayer, and then the Prime Minister will promise to “fight with everything [they] have” anyone who complains about it, declaring them “an enemy of national renewal”.

These people do not think like us. Their cultures — in as far as these men are capable of conscious thought — do not value human life. Moral consideration is only extended as far as the family, clan, or Ummah; and often disregarded to gratify whatever impulse or desire arises in the low-IQ mind of the most violent male. Most aren’t capable of the abstract thinking required to feel empathy for someone other than themselves. Centuries of cousin marriage have crippled their intelligence and impulse control. They do what they can get away with, and resent any authorities who get between them and what they want. The politics that cater to them uses egalitarianism as its window dressing, but is in practice as simple as: “I hate white people, I want to steal their stuff to give to people who look like me, and I want sexual access to their women.” The only effective deterrent is to impose a cost too great to risk getting caught — the death penalty — or to never import them here in the first place. I advocate for both.

But their allies and co-ethnics in government will continue to ensure their safe passage. Sitting Home Secretary, Shabana Mahmood was filmed on a Greek Island welcoming these men across the Mediterranean into Europe in 2015. Her account in The New Statesman relayed the sob stories of families so desperate for asylum that they dragged their children across continents to shop around for the most generous state handouts. Conspicuously absent were the single, violent males who make up the overwhelming majority of the occupants of these camps. “You have to be resilient to volunteer here”, Mahmood wrote. “Here the screams of the children are loudest; the exhaustion acute; the mixture of fear and hope at its most overwhelming. Here you are only ever moments away from seeing someone die.” She could just as well be describing the suburbs of London, a decade on from the open-borders immigration policy that she and her colleagues support. Why is their compassion never reserved for the native people of the recipient nations, who suffer preventable crimes at the hands of fake refugees?

After the two perpetrators of the Huntingdon stabbings were apprehended, Mahmood posted on X, “We now know this attack is not being treated as terrorism, and that two British-born, British nationals have been arrested.” Mahmood — a Pakistani woman, who insists it is racist to suggest she “can truly be English or British” — is trying to subversively imply that we are stuck with this problem, simply because these two descendants of foreigners were born on our soil. But it doesn’t matter: none of these criminals, whether they broke in via small boat, arrived via the passport gates at Heathrow or Gatwick, or were born here as the children of immigrants, needed to be here. We don’t have to share a country with people who hate us and want to murder and rape our family members.

Nevertheless, these crimes will continue. Keir Starmer is unwilling to repeal the human rights laws that he wrote the textbook for lawyers on how to apply. The state is already flying in Palestinians via Jordan, on full scholarships, to study at universities in London and Manchester. A Pew Research survey found that 89% of Palestinians support Sharia Law, 46% support honour killings, and 40% of Palestinians believe suicide bombings are at least sometimes justified for “defending” Islam — the highest percentage in all Muslim countries surveyed. When Denmark granted permanent residence to 321 Palestinians in 1992, 67% had received prison sentences, and 34% of their children had criminal records by 2016. 59% were dependent on state welfare. No wonder Egypt and Jordan have refused to take any displaced people from Gaza during the war with Israel. But the British state is less concerned with the safety of its people than even historic basket-cases in the Middle East.

The only solutions are mass incarceration, remigration, and the return of the death penalty. Nayib Bukele transformed El Salvador from one of the most dangerous countries in the world to the safest nation in Latin America, by just locking up murderers and MS-13 gang-members. We don’t have to allow ontologically violent men to roam free on our streets, terrorising the law-abiding majority. We don’t have to let foreign rapists into our country, let alone pay for their housing and legal representation. They can all be deported, denied entry, and their countries placed on a red-list to ensure that the people who make them uninhabitable never endanger our countrymen again. For those who cannot be expelled, or have their citizenship revoked: we can restore our world-class common-law legal system, try them with the most scrupulous evidentiary standards, and then hang rapists and murderers regardless of their complexion. These men are congenital offenders, incapable of remorse, and have incurred a moral debt that must be repaid. We cannot allow our cultural ledger to be unbalanced. All of this is a choice.

Independent MP and leader of Restore Britain, Rupert Lowe, has written to the Prime Minister to remind him that he can make these choices; and that every day he refuses to do so, another British life is ruined or lost. The fact that Keir Starmer doesn’t act should show you just how indifferent our politicians are to our suffering. It is our political class, not Brits like Wayne Broadhurst, who deserve to be replaced.